|
|
[This letter is closed for signatures.]
East Timor & Indonesia ACTION Network ALERT
Signatures Needed on House Letter Opposing More Aid for Indonesian
Military
Call your Representative today!
A letter to President Bush urging him to reconsider
strengthening military ties with Indonesia is now circulating in the House
of Representatives. The letter calls for Indonesia’s rogue military to
make considerable progress in human rights and accountability before
increasing engagement. We need to get as many signatures as possible to
send the Bush administration the strongest message possible. We need YOUR
help to do that!
The Pentagon and State Department want to remove all
Congressional restrictions on military assistance to Indonesia’s brutal
security forces. This month, the House of Representatives is debating the
Foreign Operations Appropriations bill, which contains these restrictions.
Your Representative’s signature on this letter will send an important and
timely to message both to Bush and other Representatives that support for
one of the world’s vicious militaries is unacceptable.
Please call your Representative today.
-
Urge her/him to sign the letter that
Representatives Nita Lowey (D-NY) and Chris Smith (R-NJ) are circulating
to President Bush to reconsider strengthening ties with the brutal
Indonesian military until it makes considerable progress in improving
its human right record, accountability, and security force reforms.
-
The deadline for signatures is
July 15. To sign on,
offices should contact Beth Tritter (Rep. Lowey) or George Phillips
(Rep. Smith).
The Congressional switchboard number is 202-224-3121,
or check www.congress.org for contact information. Every call makes a
difference, so please contact your Representative. Please let us know the
results of your efforts by sending an email to etan@etan.org. Thanks!
Representatives signed on so far
(as of July 8)r:
Lowey (NY), Smith (NJ), Abercrombie (HI), Andrews (NJ), Baldwin (WI),
Bishop (NY), Brady (PA), Capuano (MA), Cardoza (CA), Clay (MO), Davis,
Danny
(IL), DeFazio (OR), Delahunt (MA), DeLauro (CT), Evans,
Lane (IL), Faleomavaega
(AS), Filner (CA), Gerlach (PA), Grijalva (AZ), Hastings (FL), Higgins
(PA), Hinchey (NY), Kennedy (RI), Lee, Barbara (CA),
Lewis, John (GA), Lofgren (CA), Maloney (NY),
McCollum (MN), McDermott (WA), McGovern (MA), Oberstar (MN), Pastor (AZ),
Payne (NJ) Rothman (NJ), Sabo (MN), Sanders (VT), Schakowsky
(IL), Serrano (NY), Smith
(NJ), Tierney (MA), Udall (NM), Udall (CO), Van Hollen (MD), Waters (CA),
Waxman (CA), Weiner (NY), Woolsey (CA), Wu (OR
BACKGROUND
The House of Representatives recently passed
legislation for 2006 that would end restrictions
on Indonesia from receiving IMET, foreign military financing (FMF), and
export licenses for lethal defense articles in the 2006 Foreign Operations
Appropriations bill. But the struggle to keep the
U.S. from fully backing the brutal Indonesian military is not over yet!
Current legislation forbids such export licenses
and FMF until critical conditions are met, including presidential
certification that the Indonesian government is prosecuting members of the
armed forces accused of rights violations or aiding militia groups and
punishing those guilty of such acts. (IMET brings foreign military
officers to the U.S. for training. Foreign military financing provides
grants and loans to help countries purchase U.S.-produced weapons, defense
equipment, services and military training.)
When Indonesia’s president visited Washington in May, the Bush
administration lifted restrictions in place since 1999 on the sale of
“non-lethal” excess defense articles (surplus military equipment) and on
foreign military sales of non-lethal items, allowing the Indonesian
government to purchase military equipment, services, and training directly
from the U.S. government.
Congress first voted to restrict Indonesia from receiving IMET in response
to the November 12, 1991 Santa Cruz massacre in East Timor by Indonesian
troops wielding U.S.-supplied M-16 rifles. All military ties with
Indonesia were severed in September 1999 as the military and its militia
proxies razed East Timor. In late February, Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice restored full IMET for Indonesia. Just two days later,
the State Department's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices said,
"Security force members murdered, tortured, raped, beat, and arbitrarily
detained civilians and members of separatist movements, especially in Aceh
and to a lesser extent in Papua." East Timorese and Indonesian NGOs have
repeatedly called for restrictions on military engagement to be
maintained.
For more information see
ETAN Accuses House of
Representatives of Selling Out Rights, Reform; Bill
Would Lift Restrictions on Military Assistance to Indonesia
The Question of U.S.
Military Assistance for Indonesia and
http://www.etan.org/issues/miltie.htm.
Strengthening Military-to-Military Ties with Indonesia is Premature
Urge the President to reconsider moves toward full normalization
until transparency, accountability is assured.
June 7, 2005
Dear Colleague,
We hope you will join us in urging President Bush to reconsider
strengthening ties with the Indonesian military (TNI) until the Indonesian
government makes considerable progress in improving the military’s human
rights record, assuring military accountability, and moving forward with
security force reforms. We have serious concerns about President Bush’s
plans, as he expressed last month during Indonesian President Yudhoyono’s
visit, to seek full normalization of U.S.-Indonesia military-to-military
ties.
While the Indonesian people have made substantial strides toward
democracy recently, the military under President Yudhoyono’s
administration is retreating on other promises of reform. Despite repeated
expressions of concern by the Administration and Congress, Indonesia
continues to resist accountability for crimes against humanity and other
serious violations committed by its security forces in Indonesia and
Timor-Leste. Areas of conflict remain heavily militarized under President
Yudhoyono’s administration, and the TNI’s documented support for terror
groups very seriously compromises its compatibility with U.S.
anti-terrorism goals. Finally, the shocking assassination of Munir,
Indonesia’s foremost human rights defender, last September, dealt a
tremendous blow to human rights work in Indonesia. The investigation into
Munir’s death has stalled, an indication of a lack of government
commitment to finding and prosecuting the perpetrators.
We hope you will join us in conveying the message that the
normalization of relations at this time would be a premature reward for
the half-steps that have been taken. Full normalization would undermine
the excellent advocacy the U.S. has traditionally undertaken on behalf of
genuine progress on human rights, military reform, and accountability,
rather than encouraging more positive steps.
To sign on, or for more information, please contact Beth Tritter (Rep.
Lowey) at 225-6506 or George Phillips (Rep.Smith) at 225-3765.
Sincerely,
Nita M. Lowey
Member of Congress
Christopher H. Smith
Member of Congress
Letter Text
Dear Mr. President:
We are writing to express our concerns about the trend toward full
normalization of military ties between the United States and Indonesia.
Specifically, we are troubled that you are seeking such normalization
despite the persistence of obvious human rights, accountability, and
security force reform problems in Indonesia. We urge you to reconsider
strengthening ties with the Indonesian military (TNI) until considerably
more progress is made in these areas.
The Indonesian people have made substantial strides toward democracy
recently; last year’s first direct presidential election was a highlight.
While Indonesia’s defense minister has begun taking some welcome steps to
rein in the TNI’s many illicit business ventures, the military under
President Yudhoyono’s administration is retreating on other promises of
reform. Plans to significantly increase the number of Army territorial
commands and the TNI’s granting of permission for active duty officers to
run in upcoming regional elections represent a disquieting increase in
security force involvement in civilian political affairs.
Further, despite repeated expressions of concern by the Administration
and Congress, Indonesia continues to resist accountability for crimes
against humanity and other serious violations committed by its security
forces in Indonesia and Timor-Leste. Indonesia’s failure to issue visas in
a timely fashion to the U.N. Secretary General’s Commission of Experts
stands out as a testament to a lack of progress toward ending impunity.
Areas of conflict remain heavily militarized under President Yudhoyono’s
administration, with West Papua experiencing a marked escalation of
militarization and military operations continuing in Aceh despite the
lifting of the state of civil emergency. In addition, the TNI’s documented
support for terror groups very seriously compromises its compatibility
with U.S. anti-terrorism goals. A March 2002 study for the U.S. Naval
Postgraduate School noted that the Indonesian army had become “a major
facilitator of terrorism” due to “radical Muslim militias they had
organized, trained, and financed.”
Finally, the shocking assassination of Munir, Indonesia’s foremost
human rights defender, last September, dealt a tremendous blow to human
rights work in Indonesia. We are extremely concerned with the lack of
progress and apparent political interference in this most important
investigation. We regard prosecution of all perpetrators of this heinous
crime, consistent with international standards, as a litmus test of the
Indonesian government’s and security forces’ commitment to the rule of
law. Successful resolution of Munir’s murder should be a determining
factor in the U.S.-Indonesia security relationship.
While we have great hopes for further change under President
Yudhoyono’s administration, we believe strongly that the normalization of
relations at this time would be a premature reward for the half-steps that
have been taken. Full normalization would merely undermine the excellent
advocacy the U.S. has traditionally undertaken on behalf of genuine
progress on human rights, military reform, and accountability.
Thank you very much for considering our views; we look forward to your
response.
|