| Subject: Jakarta Backs Intervention [+Age
Analysis; Marxist Failure; Alkatiri]
4 The Australian Reports (+The Age; Sunday Mail):
- Jakarta Backs Diggers on Former Turf
- Age Analysis: Australian operation
needs to deliver
- Comment: Clock's ticking for Alkatiri
- Marxist leaders have failed [Mari
Alkatiri et al have a poor record when it comes to democracy, by Mark
Aarons, co-author of East Timor: A Western Made Tragedy]
- Editorial: In for the long haul [The UN has an
important role to play in East Timor]
- Sunday Mail update: PM slammed for Timor
remarks [ETAN]
The Australian Monday, May 29, 2006
Jakarta backs Diggers on former turf
David Nason, New York
JAKARTA has supported Australia as it works to end the bloodshed and
restore order in East Timor.
Australia's UN ambassador, Robert Hill, said it had emerged during
talks with Indonesian representatives in New York that Jakarta was happy
to have Diggers end the turmoil on its doorstep.
The former defence minister said Indonesia's deputy UN ambassador,
Adiyatwidi Adiwoso Asmady, had rejected claims by some analysts that the
presence of Australian troops on what was once Indonesian soil would
damage relations.
"Quite the contrary," Mr Hill said. "She (Ms Asmady) has
been very supportive.
"What Indonesia wants is a peaceful and stable neighbour, and they
are very supportive of us playing a role to help achieve thatgoal."
Mr Hill said Australia was also receiving excellent co-operation from
the office of UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the UN's Department of
Peacekeeping Operations and a group of countries led by Japan that hold
interests in East Timor.
"They have all basically asked us what we are looking for and said
they want to support us in any way," he said.
Mr Annan has asked the head of the UN mission in Nepal, Ian Martin, to
go to Dili and assess the situation.
Mr Martin was Mr Annan's special envoy to East Timor in 1999 when the
country, then a province of Indonesia, voted for independence, sparking a
wave of violence that resulted in more than 5000 Australian troops being
sent to the island as part of a UN peacekeeping force.
Mr Hill said anyone suggesting the current troubles were a repeat of
1999 was mistaken. "It's not a repeat of what occurred - it's a new
issue driven, on the face of it, by a failure of effective
governance," he said.
"If you have a situation where half your armed forces go on
strike, and then they are dismissed, and then rioting follows, to me
that's a failure of governance.
"But I think there's also a recognition that new states created
out of traumatic circumstances are going to be very fragile and are going
to experience major challenges as they grow and mature."
The UN Security Council released a statement over the weekend
condemning the violence and calling on East Timor's Government to restore
security and maintain human rights.
The statement applauded Australia, New Zealand, Portugal and Malaysia
for dispatching defence and security forces under bilateral arrangements.
"The Security Council welcomes the positive responses made by the
governments concerned and fully supports their deployment of defence and
security forces," the statement said.
Mr Hill said talks were under way about the relationship between the
deployed forces and the UN mission on the ground, and the protection of UN
staff.
"In an exploratory way, we are also starting to look at what might
be the future relationship between a UN-mandated force and the forces that
are on the ground under the bilateral arrangements," he said.
-----------------------------------
The Age (Melbourne) Monday, May 29, 2006
Analysis
Australian operation needs to live up to its name
By Mark Forbes
LET'S hope the bureaucrats who named the intervention into East Timor
"Operation Astute" are proved prescient.
At Dili International Airport, its approaches lined with cars and tens
of thousands desperate for Australian protection, military commander Mick
Slater delivered an upbeat view of the mission's progress.
"We've been here just over 48 hours," he said. "You can
see that the security situation throughout the city is a lot better now.
We have got just over 2000 troops on the ground and they are out there
providing security, enabling people like those you see around you to start
laughing and having a bit of a relax for the first time in several
days."
Outside the airport, pillars of smoke billowed towards the main road.
Agitated young men, some masked, some carrying machetes, confronted
returning reporters.
"Australian soldiers have to do something, they make violence,
they burn our houses," one shouted. "They look and do nothing,
where is the protection?"
Brigadier Slater conceded that there were "still some
dramas", but less than over the previous two days. However, more and
more homes and shops were torched throughout the day, along with violent
beatings and stabbings.
Troops would begin arresting those involved and confiscating
weapons.However, only those committing "serious crimes" would be
detained — those settting the fires would probably still roam free.
According to Brigadier Slater, the "gutless thugs"
intimidating citizens "fold like wet cardboard" when confronted
by Australian troops. But they have learnt the Australians will not fire
on them, unless directly threatened.
Directing his comments to the surrounding refugees, Brigadier Slater
said "the message for the Timorese people is we are going as hard and
fast as we can to make their homes safe". The message is classic
military "psyops" — appear strong and positive to inspire
confidence in the population and fear among the combatants — and hope
reality follows. The intervention force is operating in a badlands of
urban civil warfare. Political, military and ethnic divisions cloud every
scenario. If Australians fire on the militias and mobs, they risk being
caught in the crossfire of a potentially explosive conflict.
Military, police and community have split along ethnic lines, west (Lorasi)
against east (Loramonu). Once Australian troops take on one of the gangs,
they will be perceived as taking sides, and risk becoming targets
themselves.
Then comes the danger of rival, military and police groups re-entering
the conflict. The initial combatants — soldiers from the west
disillusiooned with the government of Mari Alkatiri, along with police and
military police from the west — have stayed out of Dili for the past
three days. It has been left to gangs and militia mobs, armed with
military weapons, to stage a vicious turf war, with homes, women and
children the targets.
As the death toll mounts, so do pressures for retribution and
frustration at the failure of Australian forces to deliver an immediate
peace.
Brigadier Slater believes he has all the men he needs, with
reinforcements if required. But if rebel forces, or the loyal army turn
against the Australians (improbable but not inconceivable), it becomes a
nightmare scenario for Canberra.
-----------------------------------
The Australian Monday, May 29, 2006
Comment
Clock's ticking for Alkatiri
By Mark Dodd
SOME good news. Mick Slater - commander of the 2200 troops of the
international battle group sent to restore peace in East Timor - says his
message to the Timorese people is that he's going to make their homes
safe. That will be welcome for the 50,000 people displaced by vicious
ethnic rioting in the capital Dili - most now living rough in the open;
the elderly as well as women and children and mothers with babies.
Yesterday's food riots at the World Food Program's warehouse suggest they
are keen to go home.
Brigadier Slater knows the country. As commander of the 2nd Battalion
Royal Australian Regiment, he rang the church bell in Balibo in September
1999 in a vain attempt to encourage traumatised people to return from
hiding following Indonesia's goodbye pillage after 24 years of occupation.
He likes the East Timorese and so, he says, do his soldiers. They are
appalled at the recent violence, and like many East Timorese are mystified
as to its roots. Wasn't East Timor a UN success story?
Prime Minister Mari Alkatiri - an unpopular Muslim leader in this
overwhelmingly Catholic country - has much to answer for. And so does his
Khmer Rouge-trained Interior Minister, Rogerio Lobato, the nation's
controversial chief of police.
On the East Timor army side - the trigger for the latest unrest -
defence force chief Taur Matan Ruak and his senior commanders - those of
the eastern-born Lorosae clan - have failed their first serious test in
conflict management.
What began in January as a protest by more than 300 F-FDTL soldiers
over ethnic bias and poor service conditions looks set to bring down a
government.
After dithering for months, they have only themselves to blame for an
army on the point of collapse, a police force in disarray and tens of
thousands of civilians displaced.
On the weekend, former guerilla commander turned president Xanana
Gusmao was formally asked to take a more hands-on approach to matters of
state, particularly in matters of defence and national security.
It sparked an angry response from the Prime Minister and a thinly
veiled warning to President Gusmao - he and Alkatiri cannot stand each
other - expressing confidence that he would not "cease to respect the
constitution", which is diplomatic speak for "be careful about
moving into my patch".
Canberra is showing signs that they think Alkatiri's time is up. John
Howard's comments about the need for better governance in East Timor
spells that out clearly.
One option being heard more and more by East Timorese involves another
Australian import - the President invoking emergency powers and doing a
John Kerr, East Timor's own dismissal.
-------------------------------------
The Australian Monday, May 29, 2006
Opinion
Marxist leaders have failed by Mark Aarons
Mari Alkatiri et al have a poor record when it comes to democracy
THE crisis in East Timor is a dangerous watershed for the world's
youngest nation. Although distressing in its violence and bloodshed,
Timorese democracy can survive. But the country's leadership must take
stock of the upheaval's causes and remove the stultifying control of
political, civic and economic life by Prime Minister Mari Alkatiri's
dominant faction within Fretilin, which won 57 per cent of the vote at the
country's first election.
The crisis also affects supporters of the Timor's independence struggle
over the past three decades. Sections of the Australian Left, which was
active (with other Australians) in promoting the cause of independence,
need to do some serious stocktaking if they are to assist Timor in the
long term.
There needs to be recognition that Alkatiri and some of his supporters
have a poor record when it comes to democracy. Since its inception in
1974, Fretilin has been a broad front representing social democratic,
Marxist and nationalist tendencies. Founding member and current Foreign
Minister Jose Ramos-Horta was a social democrat, while others adopted a
fundamentalist Marxist platform.
Indonesia's brutal offensives of 1977-78 eliminated the internal
leadership, leaving Marxist-inclined leaders such as Alkatiri competing
for domination of the exile community with international spokesman Ramos-Horta.
Inside the country, Fretilin reasserted its adherence to Marxism under its
new leader and current Timorese President, Xanana Gusmao. But during the
1980s Gusmao distanced himself from Marxism and eventually left Fretilin
to head a broad, nationalist front that linked his guerillas with the
Catholic Church, student organisations and the civilian underground.
Fundamentalists remained in Fretilin's leadership, notably among the
exiles in the former Portuguese African colonies. Alkatiri's Mozambican
cell was the most significant of these.
This history is important in understanding today's crisis. Few would
dispute that three figures led Timor's independence struggle. First was
Gusmao, leader of the guerillas, whose years inside an Indonesian jail
gave him Mandela-like status as the embodiment of Timor's aspiration for
nationhood. Then there was Ramos-Horta, whose indefatigable diplomacy over
two decades kept Timor on the international community's agenda and won him
the Nobel Peace Prize. Finally, there was the co-winner of that prize,
Bishop Belo (and the Catholic Church generally), whose support for the
struggle was crucial.
By contrast, Alkatiri's name was virtually unknown. Outside the
international solidarity groups and diplomats who met him in Ramos-Horta's
shadow at international forums, he was neither known nor, more crucially,
understood. Alkatiri's main work in exile was to move among Timorese
refugees, organising Fretilin cells and giving ideological direction in
preparation for running the country. Alkatiri has held power for almost
five years, during which time stories of nepotism, corruption and
authoritarianism have been too persistent to be lightly dismissed. The
struggling public service seems to have been stacked with Alkatiri
loyalists. Merit and ability have not been the main criteria for job
selection. This has undermined professionalism, politicised the civil
service and sown the seeds of resentment, disaffection and now revolt.
Alkatiri's shortcomings do not end there. Authoritarianism, of an
eerily Stalinist kind, has too often been the Government's response to
dissent. The means used by Alkatiri to ensure his recent re-election as
Fretilin leader illustrate the point. By replacing a secret ballot with a
show of hands, he not only thwarted his challenger, but actually
undermined democracy in order to proclaim his own "democratic"
victory.
The malaise in governance and the endemic abuses of power are also
personified by Interior Minister Rogerio Lobato, brother of resistance
hero Nicolau Lobato who was killed by the Indonesians in 1978. I knew
Rogerio in 1976 as a swaggering Fretilin commander. He helped me obtain
tens of thousands of dollars in Mozambique to keep an illegal radio
connection operating with East Timor, which I smuggled into Australia,
risking a lengthy prison term.
A few years later, Rogerio was jailed in Angola for smuggling diamonds,
not to assist his country's struggle but to enrich himself. Lobato's
appointment to a sensitive post in Alkatiri's Government was an important
warning sign. The recent allegation in UN cables that he spends much of
his time managing his own business affairs is consistent with his criminal
activities in Angola. Yet he was put in charge of the country's security
apparatus. Little wonder that elements of the forces within Lobato's
circle have been heavily involved in the violence.
Since independence, many Australians on the political Left have
uncritically supported Alkatiri's Government. I have been dismayed by the
fierce, and utterly misconceived, criticisms of Gusmao and Ramos-Horta and
the blindness towards Alkatiri's manifest shortcomings. Some have simply
denounced Gusmao and Ramos-Horta because they abandoned Fretilin, while
others are resentful about Gusmao's challenges to Alkatiri's dominance of
political and civic society.
Nor should we heed the voices of the political Right which is now
smugly claiming that Fretilin is irredeemably corrupt and violent. We
should not despair about Timor's prospects to become a viable, independent
nation. Yes, Timor is dominated by Fretilin, which along with other
political forces committed crimes in the Indonesian-instigated 1975 civil
war. This has been honestly admitted by Fretilin, but some Fretilin
leaders are certainly behind the mismanagement and violent criminal
behaviour that have caused and been featured in the current crisis.
But these pale in comparison with the mass crimes of Indonesia's
illegal occupation. East Timor overcame this and has the capacity to
overcome the present troubles. There are many competent and democratically
inclined Timorese (especially within Fretilin) who can lead the nation
towards stability and democracy.
The country's future now depends on Gusmao and Ramos-Horta continuing
in senior roles. East Timor's needs must come before Gusmao's desire to
retire next year or Ramos-Horta's bid to shift to the UN. Without these
two giants, Timor risks ongoing dependence on the international community.
Gusmao has a particular responsibility. He is the one figure who can unite
the warring factions from the western and eastern ends of his country.
The governing Timorese elite needs to do some hard thinking about its
next steps. Above all, Alkatiri and his supporters should drop their
conspiracy theories about Gusmao's "attempted coup d'etat" and
admit their own mistakes and shortcomings. A failure to support a new
direction by the dominant Fretilin faction would threaten the entire
independence struggle and leave their country open to the possibility of
effectively becoming an Australian client state.
Mark Aarons is co-author of East Timor: A Western Made Tragedy (Left
Book Club, 1993).
-------------------------------------
The Australian Monday, May 29, 2006
Editorial
In for the long haul
The UN has an important role to play in East Timor
AUSTRALIA'S response to the crisis in East Timor has been conducted
with textbook precision, the result of early action when signs of unrest
were first noted, and a military machine that is becoming accustomed to
moving quickly and efficiently when needed. That said, of course, the
multi-nation intervention is fraught with danger because of the
unpredictable political and social scene in East Timor, an environment
where neighbours are at each other's throats for reasons that are still to
be fully explained. The East Timorese army is split and there is enmity
between civilians from the east (Lorosae) and those from the west (Loromonu)
in a society that has, until recently, enjoyed relative cultural and
religious unity. Moreover, the country's political leaders are at odds
with one another. In the midst of this mess stand Australian, New Zealand
and Malaysian troops and police on a potential hiding to nothing.
President Xanana Gusmao appears to have the upper hand in a power
struggle with Prime Minister Mari Alkatiri, a good sign for future
stability. Mr Gusmao carries considerable moral authority in East Timor
for his role in the country's fight for independence, whereas Dr Alkatiri
is seen as arrogant and out of touch with the electorate, while his
enemies allege corruption as well. But it's clear that the two men must
find a way to work together if East Timor is not to descend into further
chaos. The damage already inflicted on the country's sense of common
purpose will have created deep wounds that may take years to repair.
Political unity will be an essential ingredient if the healing process is
to work without festering. Disarming rebel soldiers and gangs of
opportunistic thugs is under way and may yet prove to be the easy part of
a mission that is now likely to last for a year, at least.
As the major regional power, Australia has an obligation, as well as
the self-interest, to ensure East Timor does not become a total failure as
a state. That's why the Australian Defence Force was deployed immediately
and with bipartisan support. But the complexity and size of the task in a
country that has high levels of poverty and unemployment, poor
infrastructure and nascent institutions -- and now a large refugee problem
-- is such that Australia, New Zealand and Malaysia will need more than a
few extra police officers from Portugal to bring lasting stability.
Sukehiro Hasegawa, UN mission chief in Dili, admitted yesterday that
more troops and police might be required if violence was to be prevented
in the long term. Given that the local police force is no longer viable --
indeed Foreign Minister Alexander Downer says it does not exist as a force
any more -- the UN has an important role in bringing East Timor back from
the edge. It is not just a matter of disarming rebel soldiers and
corralling them in their former barracks. East Timor faces a threat to its
future as an emerging democractic country and to the fairness of its
elections due in a year. Mr Hasegawa has asked Mr Gusmao and Dr Alkatiri
to co-operate in a nationwide appeal for calm. He could have added that
political paralysis at the top was not helping the East Timorese people --
except that would not have been correct diplomatic language. Nevertheless,
that is part of East Timor's problem: lack of strong, purposeful
leadership and authority among the political elite. The UN's role, then,
should concentrate on establishing and nurturing responsible governance.
It has the capability to help make East Timor work as a truly independent
nation, one that could soon be able to throw off much of its poverty once
oil and gas revenues start flowing out of the Timor Gap.
Bringing peace to East Timor now becomes a stern defence and foreign
policy test for the Howard Government. John Howard's cabinet has made the
right decision in sending troops and that decision has been backed up with
clear statements of intent and an understanding of future calls on the
Defence Force. The long haul signalled by Mr Downer begins now.
Thankfully, Indonesia is relaxed about Australian forces returning to
their former territory. It could easily have been a point of serious
contention. With support from the US and the UN, Australia, New Zealand
and Malaysia are embarked on a good cause on behalf of the East Timorese
and for maintaining regional stability. The alternative -- a civil war
destroying what little economic activity the country now has and a
population reduced to famine and deprivation -- is too awful to imagine.
--------------------------------------
[Note: The full ETAN statement was sent yesterday]
Sunday Mail (Queensland) May 28, 2006
PM slammed for Timor remarks
From correspondents in Washington
A US-BASED pressure group has warned Australia that its invited
military intervention in East Timor to quell unrest did not entitle it to
interfere in the country's government.
The East Timor and Indonesia Action Network said it was concerned about
the situation in East Timor, where the government, with the stated support
of rebel leaders, requested the deployment of foreign forces to stem
escalating violence.
"Timor-Leste must find ways, with respectful support from the
international community, to deal with problems in a manner that will not
require troops," ETAN said.
"Statements by Australian government leaders that providing
security assistance entitles them to influence over Timor-Leste's
government are undemocratic, paternalistic, and unhelpful."
"Who governs Timor-Leste is a decision to be made by its people
within its constitution," the nongovernmental organisation (NGO) said
in a statement.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard on Friday said that East Timor,
where Canberra has ordered 1,300 soldiers to be sent to help quell a
military rebellion, has a "significant governance problem."
"If things get out of control, and they clearly have, and outside
help is needed, then those who provide the outside help are entitled to
ask those who they are helping, 'Will you make sure that you run the
country in future in a way that this doesn't allow this to happen,"'
he said.
ETAN blamed Australia for much of the problems in the tiny fledgling
country, which gained independence from Indonesia in 1999.
"Australia bears special responsibility for Timor's
underdevelopment by refusing to return revenues, totalling billions of
dollars, from the disputed petroleum fields in the Timor Sea, including
Laminaria-Corallina, and by bullying Timor-Leste into forsaking revenues
that should rightfully belong to it under current international law and
practice," the NGO said.
"Australia should not view its current assistance to Timor-Leste
as a favour, to be repaid, but instead as a partial repayment for the debt
Australia owes the Timorese people for its help during WW (World War) II
and for Australia's deep complicity in Indonesia's invasion and
occupation."
The NGO's remarks echoed those of Portugal's foreign minister, Diogo
Freitas de Amaral, who rapped the Australian prime minister for
criticizing the authorities in East Timor, which Lisbon ruled for four
centuries.
"We consider this an interference in the internal affairs of East
Timor and ... we disagree with this kind of statement by foreign
countries," said the Portuguese minister as new violence rocked the
poverty-stricken country's capital Dili.
Portugal has ordered 120 troops to help put down the violence in East
Timor, which Lisbon turned over to Indonesia in 1975.
---------------- Joyo Indonesia News Service
Back to May menu
April menu
World Leaders Contact List
Main Postings Menu
|