| Subject: Time Magazine Finds New Soeharto
Evidence, Will Keep on Fighting
The Jakarta Post
Friday, January 18, 2008
'Time' to keep on fighting Soeharto
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
Time magazine claimed to have found new evidence allowing it to
challenge a US$105.2 million Supreme Court judgment against it won by
former president Soeharto, the publisher's lawyer told a seminar on
Thursday.
Todung Mulya Lubis, legal counsel for the weekly, was referring to
files that he said provided support for Time reports that $9 billion of
Soeharto's money had been transferred from Switzerland to a nominee bank
account in Austria.
"We have gathered a number of e-mail messages with Time sources in
Austria, Switzerland and New York," Todung said in a seminar held by
the Press Legal Aid Society.
"We also have some documents proving Soeharto family business
ownership in Hong Kong and house ownership in London, New Zealand and
U.S.," he added.
Todung said Time could name all "business circle" figures
involved and that "one of them is a minister now".
Soeharto took legal action against Time for a May 1999 cover story
titled "Soeharto Inc. How Indonesia's Longtime Boss Built a Family
Fortune". The former president didn't prevail in the Central Jakarta
District Court or the Jakarta High Court. However, the Supreme Court took
the case on appeal, overturning the lower court decisions.
Todung said the defamation ruling against his client had no logical
basis because Soeharto no longer had a good reputation.
"Reports of corruption allegations against Soeharto, his family
members and cronies have been widely published by all Indonesian media.
Even a People's Consultative Assembly decree called for him to be
investigated."
The Aid Society analyzed the court's decision in an examination
involving seven experts. A report by the society suggested it was proper
for Time to publish the story because it was related to public life. The
report also said the magazine had acted in accordance with journalistic
standards as it had interviewed two Soeharto lawyers and requested
confirmation from his family.
The report also said the decision had been unfair because the Supreme
Court only considered evidence from the applicant.
It also pointed to the possibility of a conflict of interest affecting
the decision, indicating that two Supreme Court justices who heard the
case were represented in 2004 by attorneys for Soeharto in a judicial
review case.
Bambang Harymurti of the Indonesian Press Council said the Time
decision risked becoming a negative precedent for press freedom in the
country. "Any media would likely have to close down if they were sued
for that amount," he said.
Heru Hendratmoko, chairman of Indonesia's Alliance of Independent
Journalists, said press freedom in Indonesia had again come under threat
over the past few years.
"In 2001 Indonesia was ranked 40th in the Press Freedom Index, but
since 2002 it has dropped down into the 100s," he said, adding there
had been attempts to weaken key laws underpinning press freedom.
Todung said Time had until March 21 to submit a request to the Supreme
Court. He said the legal team was ready now but preferred to wait because
of the current state of Soeharto's health.
"The media is universally portraying Soeharto as a good guy now.
We would be fighting against a strong current if we submit the request
now. So, we prefer to wait for a while." (alf)
Back to January menu
December 2007
World Leaders Contact List
Main Postings Menu
|