|
Subject: Prosecutors in Muchdi Case Hit For Incompetence cases
Jakarta Globe
February 22, 2009
Heru Andriyanto
Prosecutors in Muchdi Case Hit For Incompetence
The prosecution's poor performance was a key factor in the acquittal of
former top intelligence official Muchdi Purwoprandjono of charges that he
ordered the murder of prominent rights activist Munir Said Thalib, a
rights group said over the weekend.
The Attorney General's Office appointed Cyrrus Sinaga as head of the
team that prosecuted Muchdi and Maju Ambarita as deputy prosecutor on the
grounds that the two had previously demonstrated their determination in
prosecuting military officers for alleged human rights violations in East
Timor.
Critics, however, contend that record is not a good indicator of
competence.
"All of the defendants who were brought to a rights tribunal by
the two prosecutors were ultimately acquitted of all charges in the East
Timor case," the Committee of Action and Solidarity for Munir, or
Kasum, said in a statement over the weekend.
For the trial of Muchdi, a retired military general, "we need more
than just bold prosecutors; we need ones who are professional, dedicated
and independent," the group said.
We need more than just bold prosecutors; we need ones who are
professional, dedicated, and independent.
Committee of Action and Solidarity for Munir
Muchdi was acquitted of all charges on Dec. 31, 2008 by the South
Jakarta District Court, whose judges said prosecutors failed to prove any
links between him and Pollycarpus Priyanto, a former pilot who had been
sentenced to 20 years in jail for carrying out the murder.
Prosecutors accused Muchdi of ordering the murder of Munir to avenge
his ouster from the top post of the Army's Special Forces, or Kopassus.
Muchdi was dismissed from the elite force in mid-1998 after fierce
criticism from Munir, who alleged that Kopassus was behind the abduction
of 13 activists between 1997 and 1998.
Kasum's statement cited the prosecution's demand for a lighter jail
term for Muchdi as further proof of their incompetence.
"In their indictment, prosecutors named Muchdi as the mastermind
who ordered Pollycarpus to kill Munir," the statement said. "But
they halfheartedly recommended a 15-year jail term for Muchdi, much
lighter than the life sentence sought for Pollycarpus."
"[That] did not make any sense," the group said.
Prosecutors have already filed an appeal against the verdict with the
Supreme Court.
Attorney General Hendarman Supandji told the House of Representatives
last week that prosecutors demanded a lighter sentence for Muchdi because,
unlike Pollycarpus, "Muchdi rendered exceptional service to the
country when he was a soldier."
Hendarman also said the judges in the South Jakarta District Court
ruled in favor of Muchdi because many key prosecution witnesses had
retracted their testimonies.
Back to February Menu
January
World Leaders Contact List
Main Postings Menu
|