|
Subject: Pentagon wins turf war with State over military aid
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/01/20/pentagon_defeats_state_in_turf_war_round_one
Pentagon wins turf war with State over military aid
Posted By <http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/blog/11505>
Josh Rogin [] Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - 6:20 PM
The Pentagon has won a major internal battle over control of foreign
assistance funding, delaying the Obama administration's pledge to
demilitarize foreign policy, multiple sources tell The Cable.
DOD and State <http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/11/03/the_real_state_defense_turf_war_begins>have
been fighting vigorously over who would be in charge of large swaths of
the foreign assistance budget, billions of dollars in total that are used
to aid and work with governments all over the world. Both Defense
Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have
emphasized the need to rebalance national security spending away from the
military and toward the diplomatic core, but behind the scenes their
offices have struggled to determine where the lines should be drawn.
"For too long we have focused more heavily on one of the so-called
three Ds - namely defense - and less on the other two, diplomacy and
development... And it has been my goal since becoming the 67th Secretary
of State to do all that I could to make sure that diplomacy and
development were elevated alongside defense.," <http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/12/133275.htm>
Clinton told the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition.
One big chunk of funding at issue is in foreign security assistance,
known as the "1206" account, which could total about $500
million next year. This is money used to do things like military training
and joint operations with countries outside of Iraq and Afghanistan, such
as Indonesia and Somalia.
Since the military doesn't have the lead in those countries, the
funding should flow through State, right? Well, not in 2011. The
president's budget will keep those funds in the Pentagon's purse in its
Feb. 1 budget release, following a pitched internal battle in which the
State Department eventually conceded.
"That literally is the result of vigorous arm wrestling within the
administration," one source familiar with the discussions said. The
battle had been waged primarily between the shops of Under Secretary of
Defense for Policy Michèle Flournoy and Assistant Secretary of State for
Political-Military Affairs Andrew Shapiro, but finally Deputy Secretary of
State Jack Lew got involved.
"Eventually State backed off," the source said. "They're
not sure they have the capacity to actually run the 1206 programs."
The capacity issue has hampered State's ability to take over many of
the programs it professes to want to own. In a related case, top senators
wanted to give State control over another fund, called the Pakistani
Counterinsurgency Capabilities Fund, but couldn't do so last year because
State wasn't prepared to take on the mission.
"My hunch is there are some real procedural problems that need to
be worked out before the shift can take place," Senate Armed Services
Committee chairman Carl Levin, D-MI, told The Cable. "There's
probably an effort being made to build their capacity so that they are
better positioned the next time this comes around," he said,
referring to the State Department.
Insiders working on the issue also suggested that State didn't match up
bureaucratically inside the fight. The Pentagon just has so many more
people and resources to bring to bear, and besides, the State Department's
strategy review, the <http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/12/01/new_aid_chief_lays_out_plans_to_fix_usaid>
QDDR, isn't complete.
Meanwhile, the window for Foggy Bottom to get its act together may be
closing. Despite the internal wrangling, this Pentagon is more willing to
give away authorities than others have been or might be.
"The State Department has an unusually strong advocate in
Secretary Gates in that regard," Levin noted.
In fact, Gates <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/23/AR2009122302553.html>
floated a memo last month proposing that State and DOD share about $2
billion worth of foreign assistance money and administer the accounts
jointly. But Hill staffers, who would be the ones appropriating the money,
said there was no follow-through. Many saw the memo as a decoy and not
really operative in any sense.
Besides the 1206 funds, there are still large accounts in the foreign
assistance realm that could be adjusted when the budget request comes out
in February. For example, State could be awarded the approximately $1
billion in the Iraqi Security Forces Fund, considering the U.S. Embassy in
Baghdad will be <http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/01/07/us_embassy_in_baghdad_has_plans_to_double_in_size>
taking over large parts of the training mission in Iraq soon.
In one other account focused on development, called the 1207 account,
State is expected to be given that $100 million worth of budget authority,
which had been housed at DOD. But since the 1207 money was already being
spent by State after being channeled through the DOD accounts, that's not
really such a big change after all.
Overall, State is expected to receive a hefty increase in its top-line
budget request for fiscal 2011, but much of that money will be for Iraq
and Afghanistan, allowing little growth in the rest of the State-USAID
accounts.
The slow pace of rebalancing national security spending and the lack of
a comprehensive strategy for guiding that process is the subject of a new
book by former OMB national security funding chief Gordon Adams, entitled
<amazon.com/Buying-National-Security-America-Global/dp/0415954401/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1264022721&sr=8-1>
Buying National Security: How America Plans and Pays for Its Global Role
and Safety at Home.
"The tool kit is out of whack," Adams told The Cable.
"There's been a major move over the last 10 years to expand the
Defense Department's agenda, which has been creeping into the
foreign-policy agenda in new and expensive ways."
Officials from the White House's Office of Management and Budget
declined to comment about the budget details ahead of the release
Back to January 2010 Menu
World Leaders Contact List
Main Postings Menu
|