| Subject:
Crimes of War: Justice Delayed in East Timor
http://www.crimesofwar.org/mag_timor.html
Crimes of War: The Tribunals (includes photo essay)
Justice Delayed in East Timor
By Joel Rubin
There is little mystery as to who, under the spotlight of international
attention, commanded the spilling of innocent blood and the systematic
destruction of East Timor in August 1999. The Indonesian militia swept
through East Timor with clear disregard for the laws of war but, as in so
many conflicts, there is little likelihood that the perpetrators will ever
be held accountable, despite a growing movement to establish war crimes
tribunals in the wake of atrocities around the world. In the case of East
Timor, neither the United Nations Security Council nor the Indonesian
government seem willing to take the steps to ensure that the perpetrators
are brought to justice, and the UN Mission in East Timor lacks both a
court system and access to the accused.
Like many other East Timorese, Julio Martins Riverio knows who murdered
his brother, Aryico, last year. In the softened, red light of an
equatorial dusk that has filtered into a maze of burnt-out walls and
corrugated tin roofs off one of Dili’s main roads, Riverio quietly
recalls what happened on the night the militia and TNI (Indonesian
military) arrived in their neighborhood, forced families into trucks and
herded them away to a military building on the outskirts of town.
Julio and Aryico hid in the darkness out of fear of what fate awaited
them if they went along. The following morning the brothers decided it
best to join the others, only to be sent back to their homes to gather
some belongings. While they were walking down the street, they were
surrounded by another group of TNI soldiers who accused them of being
pro-independence fighters.
"They started beating us quite badly until a group of militia
arrived," Riverio explains in a monotone. "While TNI watched,
the militia continued to beat us and stab us with their swords. I was
stabbed in the back and on the arm, but managed to break free and I ran.
That was the last time I saw my brother alive. When friends found his body
they told me he had died from the stab wounds."
More than a year and a half has passed since the Indonesian military
and its militia marauded through East Timor in the weeks leading up to and
following a UN-sponsored referendum in which the overwhelming majority of
East Timorese voted in favor of independence from Indonesia. According to
the UN Human Rights mission in East Timor, Indonesian forces killed an
estimated 1,100 people and destroyed over seventy percent of the country’s
buildings, while more than 200,000 refugees either fled or were forced
across the border into Indonesian controlled West Timor. In an effort to
get Indonesian forces to withdraw, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan
threatened to establish a war crimes court to prosecute those responsible
for violations of international humanitarian law on the island.
In the wake of the killing and destruction, the United Nations sent a
Transitional Administration into East Timor (UNTAET) with a far-reaching
mandate to secure, stabilize, and govern the tiny nation until it was
deemed prepared for true independence. Undeniable progress has been made
in this nation-building experiment. Initially, it appeared that a major
aspect of the UN mission would be to follow through with Annan’s threats
and create an international tribunal to prosecute those responsible for
committing atrocities in East Timor. Today, however, it seems the United
Nations is unwilling or unable to take the steps necessary to ensure that
justice is served.
On January 31, 2000 the UN International Commission of Inquiry on East
Timor submitted its report to the Secretary General. "Confronted with
testimonies surpassing their imagination," the commission concluded
that the Indonesian military and its militia were responsible for
"patterns of gross violations of human rights which… took the form
of systematic and widespread intimidation, killings and massacre,
humiliation and terror, destruction of property, violence against women
and displacement of people."
Such acts are crimes of war according to the Geneva Convention’s
Common Article 3, which applies to the laws of war and internal armed
conflicts. The article sets forth basic protections and standards of
conduct to which the State must adhere, prohibiting violence against
civilians and flagrant violations of human dignity. Furthermore, under
customary international law, Indonesia arguably stands guilty for its
forced movement of the East Timorese population and its vast, wanton
destruction of civilian property.
The Commission unequivocally recommended that the United Nations
establish an international human rights tribunal to bring those
responsible to justice, both to appease the East Timorese, and to reassert
the authority of the UN Security Council after Indonesia had blatantly
violated its agreement with the Council to provide security during the
UN-sponsored referendum.
Not surprisingly, the Indonesian government protested, claiming that
such a tribunal would be a violation of its national sovereignty. Instead,
Jakarta vowed that it would prosecute those responsible for gross human
rights violations and war crimes in East Timor. In turn, the Security
Council abandoned its own recommendations, and announced that the United
Nations would call on the Indonesian government to adhere to its pledge.
Given the well-documented shortcomings of the Indonesian legal system and
the lack of any specific laws that would enable the government to
prosecute soldiers for human rights abuses or crimes of war, it seemed
unlikely from the start that Jakarta would actually follow through with
its promises. Thus, Annan insisted that the United Nations retained the
right to commence an international tribunal at some unspecified point in
the future if Indonesia failed to effectively mete out justice.
A year and half later, however, the Indonesian government has yet to
commence a single trial concerning crimes committed in East Timor, and the
United Nations has done little pressure Jakarta into doing so. Given the
United Nations’ efforts to establish courts for the atrocities in
Rwanda, Yugoslavia, Cambodia, and Sierra Leone, and given its
unprecedented mandate in East Timor in which it assumed sovereign control
of a nation, it seems out of keeping that the United Nations has not moved
more forcibly.
UNTAET head Sergio Vieira de Mello says he has had to beg for adequate
resources to investigate Indonesia’s crimes, which leaves many wondeirng
whether the suffering visited on the East Timorese weighs heavily enough
on the world’s collective conscience to force the hand of an
international tribunal. The forensic and serious crimes units, "are
minimal compared to what we had in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Rwanda," says
de Mello. Put differently, 800,000 dead in Rwanda or the geo-political
importance of the Balkans compels the UN to action, while 1,100 dead on a
distant island are more easily ignored.
Since East Timor’s independence, Indonesia has democratically elected
its first president in over 40 years, the reformist Muslim scholar
Abdurrahman Wahid. He has struggled to remove the Indonesian military from
politics, and was hoping to use East Timor prosecutions against his
military opponents when he came to power. But this agenda has been
complicated by the fact that most Indonesians view the independence of
East Timor as a national humiliation. Newspaper editorials reflect a
widely-held belief that the leading militia leader, Eurico Guterres, and
his like are "national heroes" who risked their lives fighting
for their country. Indonesian Vice-President Megawati Sukarnoputri,
unarguably the most popular politician in the country and the one who
holds Wahid’s political fate in her hand, named Guterres the head of her
political party’s student wing. Further, Indonesian human rights experts
widely expect Sukarnoputri — as the forgone successor to the presidency
— to halt any progress towards East Timor prosecutions when she assumes
power. As Wahid’s health and his authority throughout the archipelago
declines, it becomes increasingly obvious that he is struggling against
formidable political factions opposed to his push for accountability.
In this contentious context, there is considerable uncertainty
regarding the Indonesian government’s willingness and ability to
prosecute those responsible for the atrocities in East Timor. Recent
months have seen mixed signals strongly indicating that the government is
more interested in appearance than action. After an evidence-gathering
trip to East Timor, the Indonesian Attorney General’s office released a
list of 22 suspects, including head militia leader Guterres. Former Armed
Forces Commander General Wiranto, who enjoyed a very close relationship
with former dictator Suharto, was found "morally responsible"
for the events in East Timor by a government commissioned human rights
inquiry. In spite of this, however, Wiranto was not included on the list
of war crimes suspects. In what seems to be a horribly misconstrued
attempt to demonstrate its commitment to prosecution, the Indonesian
government has put Guterres on trial, not for any crimes committed in East
Timor, but on a weapons charge stemming from an incident in the refugee
camps of West Timor, where he still wields significant power. Indictments
of any of the named suspects seem extremely dubious.
In early November, the Indonesian Parliament passed a human rights act
that would, for the first time in the nation’s history, empower the
courts to prosecute members of the military for human rights abuses and
crimes of war. More recently, the Parliament acted to establish an ad hoc
court to hear the East Timor cases, but Wahid has yet to ratify that
action, and no one is sure that he will. So the progress, while real, is
effectively slight.
Without an international tribunal or cooperation from the Indonesian
government to create a domestic tribunal, the struggling nation of East
Timor is left to pursue justice on its own. For its part, UNTAET is trying
desperately to uncover some sense of accountability within the confines of
the island nation. Thus far, it has managed to establish the beginnings of
a national court system in East Timor and, in early February, an East
Timor court handed down its first indictment for a crime committed during
the ballot violence, sentencing an East Timorese man to 12 years for
murder. However, because the perpetrator was such a "small
fish," the trial served to highlight UNTAET’s limitations in
facilitating justice.
Since UNTAET has no jurisdiction beyond East Timor’s border, it is
all but powerless to pursue justice for the crimes of last year. On paper,
the United Nations and Indonesia have agreed to share evidence and to
facilitate extraditions, but it is extremely unlikely that Indonesia would
relinquish a military officer or militia leader to UNTAET or to an
independent East Timor. In fact, in October UNTAET made a formal request
for the Indonesian government to extradite Guterres after the militia
leader was arrested on the weapons charge. The request was promptly
denied. And, in December, when a team of UN investigators arrived in
Indonesia to interview military witnesses, it received a less than warm
welcome, with a group of protesters attacking one of their cars. "We
will never hand over our soldiers for questioning conducted in the
interests of UNTAET,’’ declared Deputy Army Chief of Staff Kiki
Syahnakrie during the UN visit.
Given that the United Nations continues to balk at its own
investigators’ calls for an international tribunal and that there is
little, if any, reason to lend credence to Indonesia’s assurances, East
Timor will face not only certain hardship but, in all likelihood, the
continued withholding of justice. "As long as the men who killed my
brother remain unpunished on the other side of the border," Julio
Martins Riverio says softly, " I will feel like my heart is broken.
But if they come back and respond to what they have done — why and how
they did it — my heart will be able to mend a little."
Back to October menu
September
World Leaders Contact List
Human Rights Violations in East Timor
Main Postings Menu
Note: For those who would like to fax "the
powers that be" - CallCenter is a Native 32-bit Voice Telephony software
application integrated with fax and data communications... and it's free of charge!
Download from http://www.v3inc.com/ |