|
Subject: Timor justice slow but sure
Timor justice slow but sure
July 29, 2004 9:45pm Asia Intelligence Wire
East Timor will soon have to make crucial decisions about the hunt for truth
and justice for the crimes of 1999. Sarah Boyd reports.
THE United Nation's special representative in East Timor, Sukehiro Hasekawa,
has been thinking about the O J Simpson trial. "The relatives of the victim
and those of the accused needed to look each other in the eye and acknowledge
what actually happened. That trial went on for a year and cost a lot of money,
but perhaps they never did that."
Dr Hasekawa is a quietly spoken, dignified man with a strong belief in the
importance of truth. He was in Wellington last week and gave an address on the
justice and reconciliation process in East Timor.
Justice in East Timor has been a hybrid of formal judicial trials and more
emotional restorative justice hearings. The latter involves the perpetrator
going to the village where the crime occurred, meeting relatives of victims and
offering an apology. "They first receive the confession and an account of
what happened. It lasts not just hours but sometimes days."
It's been used to deal with the many less serious crimes that occurred during
the referendum period, such as beatings, house burnings and lootings. Dr
Hasegawa says the key is for the victims to receive an apology, and punishment
may include payment or community service.
"The high level of community involvement in the process, with the
participation of victims, perpetrators and communities, has ensured the
restoration of dignity of victims, facilitated the re-integration of former
low-level militia in their own communities and assisted the reparation of
community relationships."
To hear cases involving more serious crimes, the UN transitional authority
set up in 2001 an investigations unit and a special panel consisting of two
international judges and one East Timorese. The panel has handed out, for
example, a 33-year jail term to those responsible for the 1999 murder of three
nuns.
But the system is severely hampered by the fact that most of the perpetrators
live outside the country. Since trials began, there have been 54 convictions and
three acquittals, but 75 per cent of those indicted are thought to be in
Indonesia -- including some high-ranking Indonesian military commanders.
The serious crimes unit is ready to try them, yet they can't do so in East
Timor without their presence. Dr Hasegawa says an agreement was drawn up between
the UN transitional administrator, the late Sergio Vieira de Mello, and the
former Indonesian attorney-general to allow for the extradition of suspects, but
it was never ratified by the Indonesian Parliament and there have been no
extraditions.
Indonesia set up its own tribunal in Jakarta and carried out its own
hearings. "Indonesia will say they've done their best. Many in the
international community feel very dissatisfied with the results," he says.
The investigations and indictments from 1999 are supposed to be completed by
November this year, and the cases of about 30 more defendants heard by May 2005.
What happens next remains unclear, Dr Hasegawa says, with many competing
opinions and interests.
One option would be to end the justice and reconciliation process when the UN
departs: "Let's call it a partial victory and close the curtain."
Another: a full-on international tribunal costing much more than has been
invested in the process so far.
"The UN is considering the establishment of a commission of independent
experts to look into what has happened so far with the process in Jakarta and
East Timor and decide what to do," he says.
Whatever happens is very much dependent on the political will of the
leadership in Timor, given that it's now an independent country.
Dr Hasegawa says the feeling of some is that, if the international community
wants to continue with a formal justice process, it will need to take it over
and do it somewhere like Geneva or the Hague, or Wellington.
"Don't send in 100 people and put our prosecutor-general on top and do
all the work and call it a Timorese process," is how he characterises what
people are saying.
EAST TIMOR has to prioritise its resources and wants to focus more on the
victims -- widows or orphans created by the violence. He says there are many
factors at play in the decision, including a pragmatic view that it will be
easier to establish relations with Indonesia without a continuing formal justice
process.
That's countered by concerns that it could cause internal instability because
of the desire of many in East Timor for justice and the fear that violence could
return if people are seen to have been let off the hook.
Dr Hasegawa, who has worked for the UN for 30 years, including in Somalia and
Rwanda, says reconciliation and healing of communities can take years, even
generations. "What is significant is that the process has commenced widely
across the local communities in Timor-Leste, but, as importantly, between
political leaders at the national level in Timor-Leste and, crucially, between
political leaders in Timor-Leste and Indonesia."
Copyright © 2004 Independent Newspapers Ltd.
Support ETAN, make a secure financial contribution at etan.org/etan/donate.htm
Back to July
menu
June
World Leaders Contact List
Human Rights Violations in East Timor
Main Postings Menu
|