|
Subject: Balibo Family Says Rudd Govt Deliberately Inflames Dispute
Over Remains of Dead
via Joyo News
The Australian
Monday, August 17, 2009
Balibo Dispute 'a Bid to Avoid Trial'
by Caroline Overington
THE family of one of the Balibo Five believes the Rudd government has
deliberately inflamed a wrenching dispute over the remains of the dead to
avoid having to confront Jakarta over the invasion of East Timor, and the
violent death of their kin.
The Weekend Australian reported that families of the five journalists
were in dispute over whether the remains should be exhumed, and that the
Australian Federal Police was reluctant to exhume the grave without
permission from all five families.
Gary Cunningham's son, John Milkins Cunningham, said the government had
linked the exhumation of the bodies with the investigation into the crime,
in order to avoid a trial that would strain relations between Canberra and
Jakarta.
The family has legal advice from the director of the Centre for
International Law at Sydney University, Ben Saul, that the killing of the
five unarmed journalists was a war crime.
For a war crime to exist, it must first be established that an
"armed conflict" existed between at least two state parties.
In the current issue of the Australian Law Journal, Dr Saul argues that
the Indonesian invasion of East Timor in October 1975 "triggered an
international armed conflict within the meaning of the ... Geneva
Conventions". It was "no secret that those operations both
directly involved Indonesian military forces and were closely directed and
controlled by Indonesia".
Then, too, there was "protracted violence between government
authorities and organised armed groups" including Fretilin (which met
the invasion with military resistance on "a significant and organised
scale").
Dr Saul says unarmed journalists are non-combatants under international
humanitarian law, and the "wilful killing of a non-combatant" is
not an act of war. He notes that "not every killing in a war zone is
a war crime" since ordinary criminal conduct (such as the crime of
murder) can co-exist with war.
To qualify as a war crime, the killing of the Balibo Five must be
"closely related to the armed conflict as a whole" and the
Balibo killings "occurred in the direct context of a military
operation".
Indonesia has always said that the five were killed in crossfire in
Balibo, but after taking testimony from witnesses and examining previously
unreleased intelligence, a Sydney coroner ruled in 2007 that they were
"shot and stabbed deliberately, and not in the heat of battle, by
members of the Indonesian Special Forces".
The coroner named one of the killers as Captain Yunus Yosfiah, who went
on to become an Indonesian MP.
"Most Australians would agree that there is no statute of
limitations on war crimes," Mr Milkins Cunningham said.
He said it wasn't clear that the Rudd government's envoy for the Asian
Pacific Community Plan, Richard Woolcott, who was Australian ambassador to
Indonesia when the five were killed, had formally accepted the 2007
findings of the NSW coroner that the Balibo Five were deliberately killed
in order to cover up the impending invasion of East Timor by Indonesia.
Back to August Menu
July
World Leaders Contact List
Main Postings Menu
|