Subject: SMH: Trepidation not cheers greets E. Timor
agreement
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 08:42:06 -0400
From: "John M. Miller" <fbp@igc.apc.org>Received from Joyo:
Sydney Morning Herald 26/04/99
Trepidation not cheers greets agreement
ANALYSIS by MARK RILEY
It was promoted as a historic event, an agreement on self-determination for East Timor
after 24 years of hostile occupation and the loss of more than 200,000 lives.
But there was no fanfare, no celebration at the United Nations on Friday. Just
trepidation, suspicion and questions - lots of questions.
A long line of international diplomats formed outside the offices of the UN's
Asia-Pacific section shortly after Indonesia and Portugal finally agreed to the framework
for a vote on East Timorese autonomy.
All wanted to know what could be read between the lines of the bare statement that had
accompanied the announcement.
Were they really being asked to accept that the same Indonesian troops who are accused
of arming and encouraging the pro-integrationist militia in their killing sprees should
now be trusted to provide security for the vote?
Is it really an act of self-determination under the UN's definition when the Indonesian
Government will not allow a referendum on the choice between autonomy or independence but
only a lesser level of vote, which it insists on describing as a "consultation"?
A referendum would be binding, a consultation would not. And, most importantly, if an
unlikely peace could be constructed and the vote was able to proceed, would Indonesia
really accept the verdict?
They were all good questions, and none could be answered definitively. The only
certainty was that any agreement struck in the plush offices of the UN headquarters in New
York would be extremely difficult to implement on the blood-stained streets of East Timor.
The parties have agreed to come back to New York on May 5 to sign the agreement,
allowing time for the Indonesian Foreign Minister, Mr Ali Alatas, to consult his
government on the draft proposals on security and on the modalities of the vote.
Diplomats said a compromise had been reached on security that would see some form of UN
involvement, but for the time being, not a peacekeeping force.
This has not stopped senior UN officials from canvassing contingencies for a future
peacekeeping mission, even if the continuing bloodshed in East Timor suggests there would
be precious little peace to keep. Neither Indonesia nor Portugal would elaborate on the
draft security agreement, which remains the most important element of the package. In a
significant shift in rhetoric, Mr Alatas said this week that his government was no longer
talking of "disarmament" in East Timor, but calling for a voluntary laying down
of arms by both the pro-Jakarta militia and Falantil, the armed wing of the Fretilin
resistance movement.
Portugal has long pushed for a UN military presence on East Timor, but Indonesia has
staunchly resisted, insisting its armed forces, ABRI, control security.
It now appears that ABRI will retain principal responsibility for protecting peace in
the period leading up to the vote. What happens beyond that depends on how Indonesia
reacts to the outcome of the poll.
There is a growing fear at the UN that Indonesia could simply wash its hands of East
Timor and leave it to descend into civil war if its people vote against the autonomy
proposal and opt for independence. Observers believe President B.J.Habibie's Cabinet
significantly increased the possibility of the autonomy package being rejected by gutting
it last week of several key elements.
Indonesia removed a clause giving control over East Timor's lucrative natural resources
to a future autonomous government and excised the rights to a national flag, anthem and
independent representation on international bodies.
Dr Habibie and Mr Alatas have said they would ensure all the necessary constitutional
changes were made to allow East Timor to move to full independence if autonomy was
rejected. However, diplomats question whether they can issue any such assurance in the
unpredictable political and economic climate that has engulfed the territory in the past
year. There are also grave concerns that ABRI's staunch opposition to any loosening of
Indonesia's grip on East Timor could lead to a military uprising. History always comes at
a price. The question diplomats are now asking is how much higher a price will the East
Timorese have to pay?
Back to April Menu
Human Rights Violations in East Timor
Main Postings Menu
June '98 through February '99 |
