| Subject: JP: Only justice can build Dili-Jakarta
relationship
The Jakarta Post
August 7, 2003
Opinion
Only justice can build Dili-Jakarta relationship
Aderito de Jesus Soares, Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), New
York City
Jakarta's "theater of justice on East Timor" is nearing its
end, when the ad hoc human rights tribunal on Tuesday sentenced Maj.Gen.
Adam Damiri to three years in jail for his involvement in the 1999
devastation in East Timor, while letting him free pending his appeal. The
court has so far acquitted 12 of the 18 brought to trial.
The Jakarta court is clearly a sham, despite its verdict on Maj.Gen.
Adam, and the trials have been flawed, unfair and unprofessional. From the
outset, it was inconceivable that an independent court could be run by the
same people who have long been involved in such a corrupt justice system.
The situation is worsened by the powerlessness of the Special Panel
Court established by the UN in East Timor, to bring the "big
fish" in Jakarta to trial.
There is no other alternative to uphold justice but to establish an
international tribunal to process the atrocities that took place in East
Timor. This is to serve the interests of both East Timor and Indonesia.
For East Timorese victims, the enforcement of justice will help them
build a new future with their new state and will also respect their
dignity as a nation.
As for Indonesia, holding accountable those who committed heinous
crimes will deter others and will help prevent similar atrocities in Aceh,
West Papua and elsewhere in the archipelago. A tribunal could also act as
a starting point to reform the whole judiciary in Indonesia, as well as
being a real effort to move towards real democracy.
The Indonesian judicial system has failed. It has lost credibility in
the eyes of the Indonesians and the international community. Post-Soeharto
political reform in Indonesia will never be accomplished until its
military is held accountable for past human rights abuses. East Timorese
victims should not have to wait while Indonesia's judicial system is
reformed and rebuilt.
Since the August 1999 referendum, East Timorese leaders have worked
hard to strengthen ties with Indonesia at the cost of justice. Visits to
Jakarta by East Timorese foreign minister Jose Ramos-Horta, Prime Minister
Mari Alkatari and President Xanana Gusmao demonstrate this commitment.
Two years ago, Xanana gave a "warm hug" to the notorious Army
Special Forces commander Lt. Gen. (ret) Prabowo Subianto, son-in-law of
former president Soeharto. Human rights advocates were deeply disappointed
by Xanana's warmness toward the general, who has been accused of serious
human rights violations in both Indonesia and East Timor. They were
surprised by how easily East Timorese leaders put aside the past.
The East Timorese government has acted pragmatically in establishing
its relationship with the Indonesian government for several reasons. This
is especially true when it comes to dealing with the brutal abuses
committed by the Indonesian Military in East Timor.
First, the tiny and poor country still faces the possibility of
retaliation by Jakarta.
Second, subversive activities by rogue military elements and militias
remain a strong possibility, as shown by attacks allegedly carried out by
military elements and former militias in January and last December.
Finally, Dili has strong economic interests, especially regarding trade
with Indonesia. Costs are substantially lower when East Timor buys goods
from Indonesia rather than Australia.
East Timor's president and foreign minister have consistently advocated
this pragmatic position, especially when it comes to prosecuting
Indonesian officials who orchestrated gross human rights violations in
East Timor.
Prime Minister Mari Alkatiri's stance was different in the beginning.
He has openly described the ad hoc human rights court in Jakarta as
seriously flawed and called for an international ad hoc tribunal.
Unfortunately, on his recent visit to Jakarta, the Prime Minister softened
his position by declaring that his government would not push for an
international tribunal.
All three leaders now share the same view that the international
community bears the chief responsibility to advocate and establish an
international tribunal. While recognizing that serious abuses have taken
place, they want to avoid offending Jakarta, and so refuse to publicly
call for the most likely methods of holding top officials accountable.
Examples of gross human rights violations that fall under the
categories of crimes against humanity and war crimes during Indonesia's
occupation are legion. Indeed, the UN Independent Commission of Inquiry
specifically called for an international tribunal to try those who
committed such crimes in East Timor during the post-referendum massacre.
However, the UN put the recommendation on hold when it gave the Indonesian
government a chance to try the alleged perpetrators through its own
judicial system.
It is nearly impossible even to try and imagine that those who were
responsible for the massacre will be punished for their crimes against
humanity, if we only depend on Indonesia's generosity. Therefore, an
international court should be established to process these crimes against
humanity.
The writer is a human rights lawyer from East Timor, who obtained a
Masters in Law from New York University Law School.
Back to August menu
July
World Leaders Contact List
Human Rights Violations in East Timor
Main Postings Menu
|